Sixth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Prison Condition Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 7,279
Robert Sango v. Michigan State Office of Admi, et al
as 15-1590
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT D. SANGO
Defendant - Appellee: MICHIGAN STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES, SUSAN MORRIS, Administrative Hearing Officer
Reynolds v. Northpoint Training Center
as 5:2015cv00142
Nathaniel Ward v. Campbell, et al
as 15-1591
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATHANIEL WARD
Defendant - Appellee: UNKNOWN CAMPBELL, C/O, DAVID THEUT, 048, Hearing Officer
Darryl Robinson v. Joan Roggenbuck
as 15-1587
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRYL A. ROBINSON, named as Hamzah Rafi Farid
Defendant - Appellee: JOAN ROGGENBUCK, Warden
Evans v. Carl et al
as 2:2015cv00079
Plaintiff: Donald Edward Evans
Defendant: Terry Carl, Kenton County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier Thompson v. Unknown Part(y)(ies), et al
as 15-1581
Plaintiff - Appellant: LANIER THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee: UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), UNKNOWN SISSON, Prison Official/Correctional Officer, UNKNOWN RICHARDSON and others
Sumpter v. Burchett et al
as 0:2015cv00030
Plaintiff: Clarence Riley Sumpter
Defendant: Joseph Burchett, Adam Smith
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Darryl Robinson v. Unknown Sanchez
as 15-1570
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRYL A. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee: UNKNOWN SANCHEZ, Captain
Terrance Pugh v. Unknown Naples, et al
as 15-1571
Plaintiff - Appellant: TERRANCE PUGH
Defendant - Appellee: UNKNOWN NAPLES, Warden, UNKNOWN PRICE, Deputy Warden, Unknown Prince, UNKNOWN ALEXANDER, Deputy Warden and others
Robert Foley v. LaDonna Thompson
as 15-5508
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT CARL FOLEY
Defendant - Appellee: LADONNA H. THOMPSON, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Kentucky Department of Corrections
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.