Eighth Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 31,106
Lee v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lee
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Burke v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Jared J. Burke
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Petree-Kroyer v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01509
Plaintiff:
Leah Petree-Kroyer
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Kiesha Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Clark v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Amanda K. Clark
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Coffman v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Brandie Coffman
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reavis v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05030
Plaintiff:
Richard Reavis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walker v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv06058
Plaintiff:
Amanda Walker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stone v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv06057
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kay Stone
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Verdeck v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00044
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
Robert Verdeck
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
