Eighth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 73,699
Pratt v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv01029
Plaintiff: Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant: Chief Deputy Charlie Phillips and Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. United States of America Federal Government Official Officer, Agents et al
as 8:2024cv00159
Plaintiff: Kariem Qaadir Muhammad
Defendant: United States of America Federal Government Official Officer, Agents, The City of Denver and The City of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Conrad v. United States
as 24-1933
Petitioner: William Desmond Conrad
Respondent: United States of America
Salvador Murillo v. Muscatine County Jail
as 24-1936
Plaintiff: Salvador Manjarrez Murillo
Defendant: Muscatine County Jail
Bernard Manuel v. United States
as 24-1938
Other: Bernard Manuel
Respondent: United States of America
Ryan Haynes v. United States
as 24-1939
Petitioner: Ryan Nicholas Haynes
Respondent: United States of America
Wirth et al v. Burton et al
as 0:2024cv01595
Plaintiff: Donald Joseph Wirth, Jr and Nicholas Thomas Stroeder
Defendant: James Julis Burton, Jane Doe Number 1, Jane Doe Number 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Suarez Villa v. United States of America, The
as 0:2024cv01584
Petitioner: Eduardo Suarez Villa
Respondent: United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Krepps v. United States
as 4:2024cv00322
Petitioner: Brock D Krepps
Respondent: United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Henderson v. Meyers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2024cv00156
Petitioner: Javaris R. Henderson
Respondent: Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?