US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 10,202
Maget v. Richard et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Abbagayle Marie Maget and Kevin Lee Maget
Defendant:
Richard, Brush-Strode, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forrester v. Dowdy et al
as 4:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jerry W Forrester
Defendant:
Dowdy, Howard, Nips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Dowdy et al
as 4:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Darian L Watson
Defendant:
Dowdy, Howard, Nips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. Dowdy et al
as 4:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Dakota Elliott
Defendant:
Dowdy, Howard, Nips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. McCradic
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Alex Cole
Defendant:
Tyran McCradic and Darrell Elkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Mena et al
as 4:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Foster, Jr
Defendant:
Mary Mena, Robin Collins, Sierra Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Swatzel et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carr
Defendant:
A Swatzel and David Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar v. Seamster et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Lamar
Defendant:
Lonnell Oquin Seamster, Sr, Laconya Harris and Aundrea Culclager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bayler v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Kristin Lin Bayler
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Guy Henry and Thomas Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
