US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 10,202
Bell v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Joshua Terrell Bell
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA et al
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Derrick Wade Smith
Defendant:
USA, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Pulaski County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littleton v. Hudson et al
as 4:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Ricky James Littleton, Jr
Defendant:
Shirley Hudson, K Washington and Whittaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Dexter Payne, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willingham v. Dobbs et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Christopher Willingham
Defendant:
James Dobbs, Barbra Strom and Everrte Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Hurst et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Thomas Hurst, Claudia Harris and Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidd v. Does
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Raymond Kidd
Defendant:
Does and Yell County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minchue v. Ivory
as 4:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Rodney Minchue
Defendant:
Ivory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Byers et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Jared Byers, J Nunn, Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jerome Edward Washington
Defendant:
David P Cotten, Jason Mitchell, Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
