US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Cases 11 - 20 of 46,259
Marbley v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jaster Lee Marbley
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Solomon Graves and N Faust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowley v. Lemons et al
as 4:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Crowley
Defendant:
Lemons, Lee, Arce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaney v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
James Robert Chaney
Defendant:
Branden Davis, Dale Reed, Antonio D Johnson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheat v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 4:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Tammy Wheat
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Murphy v. Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ryan Murphy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Randolph Baltz, Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Pullen v. Does
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wendel Pullen
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Shock et al
as 4:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Shaleen Cecile Manning
Defendant:
Andy Shock and Lona McCastlain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holliday v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Russell Holliday
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and Lona McCastlain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
