US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Cases 81 - 90 of 46,311
Fleeman v. Johnson Bros Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Gary D Fleeman
Defendant:
Johnson Bros Corporation and Joe Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Martin v. Centennial Bank
as 4:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Martin
Defendant:
Centennial Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Kellon v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Lamar Kellon
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
James Gibson, Shipman, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weeks v. Arkansas Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Thomas W Hurst, Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Leslie Carol Brown
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Coriolan v. BIH Express Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Rudolphe Coriolan
Defendant:
BIH Express Inc, Trans-Porte Inc and Keanna Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rice v. USA
as 4:2024cv00383
Petitioner:
Antonio Lamont Rice
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
