US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Cases 11 - 20 of 46,025
Bishop v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Regena Bishop
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Richerson v. Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jacob Richerson
Defendant:
Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Southern v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 4:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Southern
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Radford v. Westbrook et al
as 2:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
T Westbrook, Tyrone Allison and Moses Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Scott Taylor, M Kelly, B Edmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isaac v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Isaac
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Burns v. Calaway et al
as 4:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Brandon Burns
Defendant:
Sean Calaway, Charles Fears and Marty Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Meraz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jerome Meraz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Chistopher Budnick, Toni Shockey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pollins v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Darmartress Collins
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Chistopher Budnick, Toni Shockey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.