District Court Cases in North Carolina
Cases 41 - 50 of 87,266
Eaves et al v. Octapharma Plasma, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Sarabeth Eaves and Bonnie Eaves
Defendant:
Octapharma Plasma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pavkovich v. USA
as 5:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ben Pavkovich
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00437
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Davis, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Milligan v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Kelly Milligan
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Bank of America Corporation, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Oppenheimer v. Highland Falls Country Club, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Highland Falls Country Club, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Gunter v. US DOJ et al
as 5:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Angela Dell Gunter
Defendant:
US DOJ, NC SBI and NC FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wrenn v. Williamson et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Simone Wrenn
Defendant:
Kiara Williamson, DaJour Jones, Deborah Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Cabinet Solutions USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Lenaway v. Octapharma Plasma, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Alana Lenaway
Defendant:
Octapharma Plasma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
