Cases 1 - 10 of 22,572
Elmore v. Houk
as 1:2007cv00776
Petitioner:
Phillip Elmore
Respondent:
Warden Tim Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Braden v. Bagley
as 2:2004cv00842
Respondent:
Margaret Bagley
Petitioner:
David Braden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Courtemanche #204238 v. Royster et al
as 1:2006cv00218
Plaintiff:
Richard Courtemanche #204238
Defendant:
Robin Royster, William Nelson, Jerome Wisneski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sueing #139068 v. McKee
as 1:2008cv00932
Petitioner:
Jerome Sueing #139068
Respondent:
Ken McKee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDonald v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 3:2008cv01718
Petitioner:
Dewitt McDonald, Jr.
Intervenor:
Erie County Prosecutor's Office
Respondent:
Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
Amicus Curiae:
Robert T. Smith and Southern Christian Leadership Conference
Interested Party:
BCI&I
Not Classified By Court:
Sandusky Register
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riches v. Pitt et al
as 2:2007cv14615
Defendant:
SJP, PJP, MJP and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Riches
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Kevin Tolliver v. Michael Sheets
as 08-3177
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN A. TOLLIVER
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL SHEETS, Warden, Warden
Allan White v. Millicent Warren, et al
as 09-1445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLAN WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
MILLICENT WARREN, DENNIS SERGENT, WILLIE RILEY, Deputy and others
Peoples v. Eberlin
as 1:2007cv02901
Petitioner:
Joseph Peoples
Respondent:
Michele Eberlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emmerick v. Seals et al
as 3:2007cv00417
Plaintiff:
James Erick Emmerick
Defendant:
Ron Seals, Captain Kent Hatcher, Captain Ron Parton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
