Cases 111 - 120 of 566,909
Anderson v. Thomas
as 7:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Alexis Anderson
Defendant:
Lt. P. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUFKIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
NILDA LUFKIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wooten et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 6:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
June Dean Wooten and Frederick Wayne Wooten
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hanson v. Depot LBX, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Pansy Hanson
Defendant:
Depot LBX, Inc. doing business as Depot Grille
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Konick, Trustee v. Board of Supervisors of Rappahannock County
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
David L. Konick, Trustee
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors of Rappahannock County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Greensville Correctional Center
as 7:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Lassiter
Defendant:
Greensville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Flottemesch v. Greenville County Sheriff's Office
as 6:2024cv01737
Plaintiff:
Gaylan Flottemesch
Defendant:
Greenville County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Moses v. Corum et al
as 3:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Corey Te'Darrell Moses
Defendant:
Mark Wallace Corum, Town of Cramerton and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
King v. Kenneth
as 5:2024ct03145
Plaintiff:
Darnell William King
Defendant:
Kay Kenneth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
