Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Teashot v. Green Mountain Coffee, et al
as 14-1072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEASHOT LLC, a Colorado limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN MOUNTAIN COFFEE ROASTERS, INC., a Delaware corporation, KEURIG, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation and STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation
Treehouse Foods, Inc. et al v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00905
Plaintiff:
Treehouse Foods, Inc. , Bay Valley Foods, LLC , Sturm Foods, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., Keurig, Incorporated and Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., f/k/a Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., and as successor to Keurig, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Louisiana Municipal Police Emp v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters
as 14-199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Employees' Retirement System of Government of the Virgin Islands, LEAD PLAINTIFF, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, LEAD PLAINTIFF, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Board of Trustees of the City of Fort Lauderdale General Employees' Retirement System, LEAD PLAINTIFF, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
Barbara D. Carlini, Robert P. Stiller, William D. Davis and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Lawrence J. Blanford, Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and Frances G. Rathke
Securities & Exchange Commission v. McGinnis et al
as 5:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Chad C. McGinnis , Sergey Pugach and Bella Pugach
Movant:
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Fifield v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters
as 13-4048
Plaintiff:
Steve Fifield, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kambiz Golesorkhi and William C. Dailey
Defendant - Appellee:
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., Robert P. Stiller and Lawrence J. Blanford
Horowitz v. Green Mountain Coffee Roaster
as 13-1563
Plaintiff:
Dan M. Horowitz, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Paulo Sebastian Menendez, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Daniel Himmel, Derivatively on Behalf of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mike Shanley, Jerzy Warchol, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Robert M. Nichols and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters Inc., Lawrence J. Blanford, Frances G. Rathke and others
EMG Technology, LLC v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
EMG Technology, LLC
Defendant:
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and Keurig, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SPARK INNOVATORS, CORP. v. GREEN MOUNTAIN COFFEE ROASTERS, INC.
as 2:2012cv05397
Plaintiff:
SPARK INNOVATORS, CORP.
Defendant:
GREEN MOUNTAIN COFFEE ROASTERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
