Cases 11 - 20 of 23,965
CURRY v. DAVIS
as 1:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
RICKY SHANE CURRY
Defendant:
OFFCIER MR. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF GREENSBORO and KOURY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEPANSKY v. FORSYTH COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA MUNICIPALITY et al
as 1:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
MEGAN STEPANSKY
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA MUNICIPALITY, JUDICIAL ASSISTANT JULIE JOHNSON, ATTORNEY JOSEPH SCHMITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
DEESE et al v. FKH SFR PROPCO K, L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEESE and JEANNE DEESE
Defendant:
FKH SFR PROPCO K, L.P. and FIRSTKEY HOMES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
NEPTUNE v. COBBLE RIDGE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
FRANTZ NEPTUNE
Defendant:
COBBLE RIDGE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION and DAVID J. DARIGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SEWELL v. BOP
as 1:2024cv00472
Petitioner:
DAVID ERIC SEWELL
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
AL-BAYYINAH v. JAMES
as 1:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
JATHIYAH A. AL-BAYYINAH
Respondent:
WARDEN JAMEL JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
GATEWOOD v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
ERIC GATEWOOD
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
