Cases 51 - 60 of 1,189,558
SPEIGHTS JR. v. NOBLE et al
as 2:2024cv03216
Petitioner:
ERIC A. SPEIGHTS JR.
Respondent:
ANDRIA NOBLE, JARED STRUBEL and EMILY ANSTAETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBISON v. WENGER et al
as 2:2024cv03217
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY C. ROBISON
Defendant:
BEAU D. WENGER, Scott A Smith, David C Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harjo v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00282
Petitioner:
Richard Harjo
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buckner v. Sequoyah County
as 6:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Eddy Buckner
Defendant:
Sequoyah County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES SERFASS
Defendant:
CASEY JAMES, DEANNA DELLATORRED, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Prime Care Medical
as 1:2024cv00976
Plaintiff:
Christine Gibbs
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Jackson
as 1:2024cv03511
Petitioner:
Emonte Brooks
Respondent:
Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Dickerson
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dean Miller
Defendant:
Stanley Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mock v. Holloway
as 3:2024cv00724
Petitioner:
Brian Ray Mock
Respondent:
Warden James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Grady Perry, James Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
