Cases 121 - 130 of 879,651
Carrero Silva v. State of New York
as 24-1330
Plaintiff:
SANTO CARRERO SILVA
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK and MARK DUANE LENTINI, Dr.; Albany Medical
US v. Maurice Shackleford
as 24-6478
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE D. SHACKLEFORD
Axiom Product Administration v. Dan O'Brien, et al
as 24-2025
Plaintiff:
Axiom Product Administration
Defendant:
Dan O'Brien, an individual, DMO Auto Acquisitions LLC, DMO North Hampton LLC and others
Garces v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-3166
Plaintiff:
LUIS MANUEL GARCES
Defendant:
M. GAMBOA, KERN KLARK, D. HERNANDEZ and others
Whitford v. Salmonsen, et al.
as 24-3177
Plaintiff:
MAKUEEYAPEE D. WHITFORD
Defendant:
JIM SALMONSEN, C. JOHNSON and BRIAN GOOTKIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund et al v. D. Spence Excavating, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02351
Plaintiff:
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund, Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Fund, Midwest Operating Engineers Local 150 Apprenticeship Fund and others
Defendant:
D. Spence Excavating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
WHISLER et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHISLER and AMBER WHISLER
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MURAWSKI v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
JEREMY D. MURAWSKI
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Cortez et al v. Sterling Card Solutions Holdings, LLC
as 3:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cortez and Phillip Matoy
Defendant:
Sterling Card Solutions Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
