Cases 11 - 20 of 6,957
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gomez v. JP Morgan Chase N.A.
as 8:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Gomez
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Coates et al v. Charles Schwab & Company Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Carol R Coates and Carol Russell Coates Trust
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Company Incorporated, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jon Dunn et al v. JP Morgan Chase and Co. et al
as 2:2024cv03504
Plaintiff:
JON DUNN and Laura Dunn
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
M&T Bank v. Chryssoula Arsenis, et al
as 24-1723
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK, other Hudson City Savings Bank
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00932
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nguyen et al v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A. et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Thoai Nguyen and Vladimir Thomas
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase, Federal National Mortgage Association and JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
John Morris Anderson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 24-1718
Plaintiff:
JOHN MORRIS ANDERSON
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
