US District Court for the District of Rhode Island Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sennon v. Houston House
as 1:2023cv00231
Petitioner:
Joel P. Sennon
Respondent:
Houston House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mosley, et al v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2020cv00455
Defendant:
Lynn Corey, Lieutenant Darcy, Capt. Walter Duffy and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mosley, Shane Feix (Felix) and Shane Feix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahoney v. Martin
as 1:2020cv00349
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Martin
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arevalo Carrillo v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2020cv00192
Respondent:
MATTHEW T ALBENCE, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S Attorney General William Barr and others
Petitioner:
Elmer Alfredo Arevalo Carrillo
Defendant:
Acting Director Todd Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hemingway v. Blanchette
as 1:2019cv00603
Plaintiff:
Bobby Hemingway
Defendant:
Edward A. Blanchette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mothersell v. F.B.O.P Health Care
as 1:2019cv00403
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Mothersell
Defendant:
F.B.O.P Health Care and Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guerra v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections
as 1:2015cv00445
Plaintiff:
Fernando Guerra
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prall v. Sixth Division District Court et al
as 1:2013cv00654
Petitioner:
Tormu E. Prall
Respondent:
Sixth Division District Court, Providence Superior Court, Fourth Division District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McMann v. Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation
as 1:2013cv00570
Defendant:
Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation
Plaintiff:
Paul J. McMann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
