Alabama Real Property Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 992
Grimes v. White et al
as 2:2020cv01344
Defendant:
Joshua White, Wells Fargo and Federal National Mortgage Association
Plaintiff:
John Grimes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Green v. Oxford, City of et al
as 1:2020cv01281
Defendant:
Oxford, City of and Mike Roberts
Plaintiff:
Wren Green
Davis v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions
as 2:2020cv00632
Plaintiff:
Adina Davis
Defendant:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King Fred Property Management LLC v. Birmingham, Alabama, City of
as 2:2020cv01270
Defendant:
Birmingham, Alabama, City of
Plaintiff:
King Fred Property Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sarlo et al v. Ruby Tuesday Inc
as 5:2020cv01273
Plaintiff:
Lory Sarlo and Michael Sarlo
Defendant:
Ruby Tuesday Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. Mercedes Benz et al
as 2:2020cv01247
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz and Takata Airbag
Plaintiff:
Myah Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2020cv01228
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
PNC Bank National Association v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2020cv01152
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank National Association
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Revenue, United States of America, Ricky Joe Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Britt et al v. The Terminix International Co., L.P. et al
as 1:2020cv00383
Petitioner:
Brian Britt and Elizabeth Britt
Defendant:
Jim Faust and The Terminix International Co., LP
Respondent:
Terminix International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Simmons v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 2:2020cv00548
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Plaintiff:
JoCatherine Simmons
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
