US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 31 - 40 of 26,321
CLEGG v. WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE CLEGG
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECT HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHURCH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Debra Church
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LEIGH v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
TREMAINE DESHUN LEIGH
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TURNER v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
YEHOWSHUA I TURNER
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PROPERTY-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. SCHREIBER et al
as 5:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
PROPERTY-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY and OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
JAMES SCHREIBER, JR, BRENDA SCHREIBER, JAMIE P KEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
CAVALIERE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP et al
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
GRAYSON CAVALIERE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP, WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, WALMART INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CARLAN v. ASHFORD
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLAN
Defendant:
JUDGE JASON E ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
