Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 50,103
Castro-Mota v. Miesel, ET AL
as 3:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Santos Castro-Mota
Defendant:
Dale Miesel, CO. and Superintenden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Prime Care Medical, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01668
Plaintiff:
JAMES GOODE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
TUCKER v. ANTHONY et al
as 5:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUCKER
Defendant:
JUDGE JAMES T. ANTHONY, ALFRED STIRBA, EARL C. SUPPLEE, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
WALLACE v. BARNACLE et al.
as 3:2024cv00087
Defendant:
SHAWN WALLACE, J. BARNACLE, D. RADZIEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI ALBION et al
as 2:2024cv01640
Petitioner:
KEIFF KING
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI ALBION and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nobblen v. Harry et al
as 4:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
William Nobblen
Defendant:
Laure Harry, Kathy Brittain, County of Philadelphia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: ANTHONY YORGEY
as 5:2024cv01748
Not Yet Classified:
ANTHONY YORGEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. BARNACLE et al.
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
J. BARNACLE, D. RADZIEWICZ and HOLLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
