Fourth Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Hines v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hines
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
MCGEE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
NANCY M. MCGEE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wise v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00100
Defendant:
Sherie Erica Wise and Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Hall v. Saul
as 1:2020cv02567
Plaintiff:
Shamia Shinef Hall
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1381 a
THORPE v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv00893
Plaintiff:
Darryl D Thorpe and DARRYL D. THORPE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Williams v. SSA (Social Security Administration)
as 1:2019cv00983
Defendant:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Pamela Denise Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
LINK v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2019cv00662
Plaintiff:
TINA OLIVER LINK
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Martin v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00437
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Nicole Susan Martin
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CHRISTIAN V. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00949
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN THOMAS CHRISTIAN
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Flowers v. Berryhill
as 7:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
Angela Leigh Flowers
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
