Fourth Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 191 - 200 of 49,498
Johnson v. Carrols Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv01548
Plaintiff: Robert W. Johnson
Defendant: Carrols Corp., Restaurant Brand International Inc., Burger King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SMITH v. GREENSBORO NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
as 1:2024cv00436
Plaintiff: JUSTICE SMITH
Defendant: GREENSBORO NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Charlotte NC DEA Federal Narcotic Officers
as 3:2024cv00515
Plaintiff: Justice Smith
Defendant: Charlotte NC DEA Federal Narcotic Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Margaret Smith v. Stephanie McComas
as 24-1479
Plaintiff: MARGARET JEAN SMITH
Defendant: STEPHANIE R. MCCOMAS, STATE HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1477
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1476
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Martin v. SAP/SAPNS2
as 1:2024cv00882
Plaintiff: Folake Martin
Defendant: SAP/SAPNS2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00294
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00511
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?