Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 36,688
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024hc02096
Petitioner:
Daryl Williams
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, JESSICA SAGE and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TISDALE v. VANGORDER
as 1:2024cv00408
Petitioner:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Respondent:
VANGORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. ISHEE
as 1:2024cv00413
Petitioner:
SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent:
TODD ISHEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saenz-Quintero v. FCI Bennetsville (WARDEN)
as 0:2024cv03009
Petitioner:
Jose Saenz-Quintero
Respondent:
FCI Bennetsville (WARDEN)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nealy v. Warden of MCTC et al
as 2:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
Michael Nealy
Respondent:
Warden of MCTC and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Schaefer
as 7:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
Malcom Rashad Pittman
Respondent:
George E. Schaefer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Kenneth White
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stutler v. MCCJ
as 5:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
Aric Stutler
Respondent:
MCCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Blystone v. Bayliss, Warden
as 5:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Charles Blystone
Respondent:
Melissa Bayliss, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Damron v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Christopher R. Damron
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
