US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 447
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. VAPECO DISTRIBUTION LLC
as 1:2019cv00990
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ex rel. JOSHUA H. STEIN, Attorney General and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
VAPECO DISTRIBUTION LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v, EONSMOKE LLC
as 1:2019cv00987
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
EONSMOKE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BALLENTINE et al
as 1:2019cv00959
Defendant:
LYNTON YATES BALLENTINE, JAMES RONALD PEGGS and JEFF L THIGPEN
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
JONES v. CITY PLAZA, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00924
Defendant:
CITY PLAZA, LLC, T.E. JOHNSON & SONS, INC. and ONLINE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B JONES and MICHAEL B. JONES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al v. TINTED BREW, INC.
as 1:2019cv00886
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and JOSHUA H. STEIN
Defendant:
TINTED BREW, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PALOMO v. HOWARD
as 1:2019cv00884
Petitioner:
OLGA RODRIGUEZ PALOMO
Respondent:
DONALD RAY HOWARD
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BYNUM
as 1:2019cv00831
Defendant:
MILELE BYNUM and MILELE KUDUMU
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
WHITFIELD v. COMENITY BANK
as 1:2019cv00697
Defendant:
COMENITY BANK
Plaintiff:
DEVONA D. WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
HOLLIFIELD v. UNIFUND CCR, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00695
Defendant:
SESSOMS & ROGERS, P.A. and UNIFUND CCR, LLC
Plaintiff:
SHERRY HOLLIFIELD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HAYHURST V. KELLER WILIAMS REALTY, INC.
as 1:2019cv00657
Defendant:
KELLER WILLIAMS REALTY, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HAYHURST
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.