US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 566
Shockey v. Cox et al
as 5:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Ira Shockey
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Cox, Correctional Officer Walters, Correctional Officer Holdren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeemer v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Richard McNeemer
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs and Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Jacob Shields
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. McKnight
as 2:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
Michael Palmer
Defendant:
Correctional Officer David McKnight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez-Bueno v. Looney et al
as 1:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Ray Ramirez-Bueno
Defendant:
C. Looney, Johnson, Dinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chapman v. State of West Virginia et al
as 2:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Oscar J. Chapman
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, John Doe, John Doe Commissioner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Alderson Federal Prison Camp
as 1:2023cv00403
Petitioner:
Jennifer N. Manley
Respondent:
Alderson Federal Prison Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jimerson v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jimerson
Defendant:
FCI Beckley Warden Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White v. Hendricks
as 1:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Kevin White
Defendant:
Joe Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Baker v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Beverly Allen Baker
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
