Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 66,762
Thompson v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Petitioner:
Dennis Thompson
Respondent:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
Kenneth Rashaad Robertson
Respondent:
Edward O. Pearson United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hollon v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Hollon
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. M.D.O.C.
as 3:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Donny McGail Scott
Defendant:
M.D.O.C.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Donny McGail Scott
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez-Pujol v. Humphrey
as 1:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Yetmis Martinez-Pujol
Respondent:
C Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hamilton v. Rule
as 4:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
Brenda Hamilton
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Portillo v. Lubbock County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
Lee Portillo
Respondent:
Lubbock County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
De Mandueno Garcia v. USP Victorville
as 4:2024cv00454
Petitioner:
Felipe De Mandueno Garcia and Carlos Jesus Madueno
Respondent:
USP Victorville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martin v. Harrison
as 24-60238
Petitioner:
Clarence Martin
Respondent:
C. Harrison, Warden, Yazoo City Low
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
