Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 101 - 110 of 66,805
Esteban-Bravo v. Yazoo City USP et al
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff: Tirso Esteban-Bravo
Defendant: Yazoo City USP and FCI Warden
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Diaz v. Fletcher
as 6:2024cv00183
Petitioner: Enrique A. Diaz
Respondent: Sheriff Brandon Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Osmar v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01268
Petitioner: Clifford Dean Osmar, Jr
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Anthony v. Hooper We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01352
Petitioner: Philip Anthony
Respondent: Warden Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Feliz v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00701
Plaintiff: Braini Feliz
Defendant: Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00074
Petitioner: Jorge Alberto Rodriguez
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cabello v. Hijar
as 24-50407
Petitioner: Archie Cabello
Respondent: Sandra Hijar, Warden, La Tuna Federal Prison
Moore v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv01254
Petitioner: Tiuan J Moore
Respondent: State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mendez v. Lumpkin
as 24-20222
Petitioner: Jose Guillermo Mendez
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Macias v. Lumpkin
as 24-20218
Petitioner: Carlos Arturo Macias
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?