US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Other Statutes Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 1,832
GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. v. MORALES et al
as 1:2019cv00695
Plaintiff:
GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant:
DANIELLE MORALES, MICHAEL STRAHAN, MARK HERTEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MINOR v. AMERICOLLECT, INC.
as 1:2019cv00642
Plaintiff:
APRIL DAWN MINOR, f/k/a MORGAN and APRIL DAWN MINOR
Defendant:
AMERICOLLECT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MINOR v. CHOICE RECOVERY, INC.
as 1:2019cv00640
Defendant:
CHOICE RECOVERY, INC.
Plaintiff:
APRIL DAWN MINOR
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MINOR v. IMC CREDIT SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2019cv00633
Defendant:
IMC CREDIT SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
APRIL DAWN MINOR, f/k/a MORGAN and APRIL DAWN MINOR
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BREWER v. ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC
as 1:2019cv00600
Plaintiff:
TERESA BREWER
Defendant:
ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CALDWELL v. RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
as 1:2019cv00549
Defendant:
RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC, d/b/a RMP, LLC and RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
Plaintiff:
BRENDA CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MARTINDALE v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BLOOMINGTON, INC.
as 1:2019cv00513
Defendant:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BLOOMINGTON, INC.
Plaintiff:
KENNETH "TONY" MARTINDALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 dd
LOCK, II v. NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2019cv00285
Plaintiff:
KENNETH C LOCK, II and KENNETH CODY LOCK, II
Defendant:
NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GLASS v. NATIONAL CREDITORS CONNECTION, INC.
as 1:2019cv00139
Plaintiff:
KARL GLASS
Defendant:
NATIONAL CREDITORS CONNECTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
STOHLER v. EBEYER
as 1:2019cv00098
Plaintiff:
TANYA STOHLER
Defendant:
ANTHONY EBEYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
