Eighth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 176
Larry v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2018cv00116
Plaintiff:
Julius J Larry, III
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of , Asa Hutchinson , Leslie Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Walker v. Krebs et al
as 4:2018cv04015
Plaintiff:
Clayton Walker
Defendant:
Shantel Krebs, Marty Jackley and Kea Warne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Krebs et al
as 5:2018cv05010
Plaintiff:
Clayton Walker
Defendant:
Shantel Krebs, Secretary of State Office, State of South Dakota and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. Simpson et al
as 2:2017cv02207
Defendant:
Tom Cogan, Mary Townsend, Sergeant Jeff Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Chris White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Morris v. Cox Enterprises Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00606
Plaintiff:
Jean Morris
Defendant:
Cox Enterprises Inc , Cox Automotive Inc. and Autotrader.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mondy v. Messina et al
as 2:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Elijah Mondy, Jr
Defendant:
Adrian Messina , Jesse Vescon Hollowell, Jr , Helena-West Helena Arkansas, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
NAACP, et al v. Ferguson-Florissant
as 16-4511
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Missouri State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Redditt Hudson, F. Willis Johnson and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ferguson-Florissant School District
Defendant:
St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners
Watson et al v. Martin et al
as 4:2016cv00809
Plaintiff:
Jim Watson , Cynde Watson and Sharon Boehm Hussman
Defendant:
Mark Martin , Rhonda Cole , C S Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Gray et al v. St. Louis City Board of Election Commissioners
as 4:2016cv01548
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray and William Koppelmann
Defendant:
St. Louis City Board of Election Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
