Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 862
James Michael Fayed v. Warden SQSP
as 2:2022cv05120
Petitioner:
James M. Fayed
Respondent:
Warden SQSP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
McDonnell v. Fhuere
as 3:2022cv00909
Defendant:
Michael Martin McDonnell
Respondent:
Superintendent Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Stay of Execution
Jerry Frye v. Ron Broomfield
as 22-99008
Petitioner:
JERRY GRANT FRYE
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden, San Quentin State Prison
(DP) Bolin v. State of California
as 1:2022cv00728
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Paul C. Bolin v. State of California
as 2:2022cv03925
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Alfredo Garcia v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-99007
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALFREDO LUCERO GARCIA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and RON CREDIO, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex
Clarence Dixon v. David Shinn
as 22-99006
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLARENCE WAYNE DIXON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
David Gulbrandson v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-99005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID GULBRANDSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, JEFFREY VAN WINKLE, Warden, Arizona State Prison Florence Complex and STEPHEN MORRIS, Warden, Arizona State Prison Eyman Complex
Zane Floyd v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-99004
Petitioner / Appellant:
ZANE M. FLOYD
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART, Warden and AARON FORD, Attorney General
William Witter v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-99003
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM WITTER
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART, Warden and AARON FORD, Attorney General for the State of Nevada
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
