Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 864
Cary Williams v. William Gittere, et al
as 23-99006
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARY WALLACE WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE and ADAM PAUL LAXALT
Mark Bradford v. Ron Broomfield
as 23-99005
Petitioner:
MARK ALAN BRADFORD
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden
Cromwell v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00783
Petitioner:
Robert Louis Cromwell
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Staci Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Robin Row v. Janell Clement, et al
as 23-99004
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBIN LEE ROW
Respondent / Appellee:
JANELL CLEMENT, THOMAS J. BEAUCLAIR and BRIAN UNDERWOOD
Demetrius Howard v. Oak Smith
as 5:2023cv00705
Petitioner:
Demetrius Howard
Respondent:
Oak Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Paul Speer v. Staci Ibarra, et al
as 23-99003
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL BRADLEY SPEER
Respondent / Appellee:
STACI IBARRA, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex and RYAN THORNELL, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections
David Bollinger v. William Gittere
as 23-99002
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID BOLLINGER
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden
Alfonso Blake v. William Gittere, et al
as 23-99001
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALFONSO MANUEL BLAKE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE and CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Attorney General
Scott Clabourne v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-99000
Petitioner / Appellant:
SCOTT DRAKE CLABOURNE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, of the Arizona Department of Corrections and CHARLES GOLDSMITH, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex
Theodore Shove v. State of California et al
as 2:2023cv01227
Petitioner:
Theodore Shove
Respondent:
State of California and U.S. District Court Central District of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
