Contract Cases

Miller Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 101 - 110 of 6,559
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 5366 LOGISTICS LEOPARDO MPA SDVOSB JV, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00866
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Borek's Concrete Company
Defendant: 5366 Logistics Leopardo MPA SDVOSB JV, LLC, Continental Casualty Company d/b/a CNA Financial Corporation and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY doing business as CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Ferguson Enterprises, LLC et al v. Harper Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01855
Plaintiff: Ferguson Enterprises, LLC and United States
Defendant: Harper Construction Company, Inc. and Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00597
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company, Inc. and Aegis Security Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc. v. Up-Side Management Company, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv00597
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company, Inc. and Aegis Security Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act NEW
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America f/u/b SiteOne Landscape Supply, LLC v. G&C Fab-Con LLC et al
as 9:2023cv81364
Plaintiff: United States of America f/u/b SiteOne Landscape Supply, LLC
Defendant: G&C Fab-Con LLC, Everest Reinsurance Company, Sunflower Landscaping Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Everest Reinsurance Co. et al
as 9:2023cv81366
Plaintiff: United States of America f/u/b SiteOne Landscape Supply, LLC, SiteOne Landscape Supply, LLC and United States of America
Defendant: Everest Reinsurance Co., G&C Fab-Con LLC, Sunflower Landscaping, Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States for the Use of Universal Electronic Alarms Inc. et al v. Endurance Assurance Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv02047
Plaintiff: United States for the Use of Universal Electronic Alarms, Inc., Universal Electronic Alarms, Inc., United States for the Use of Universal Electronic Alarms Inc. and others
Defendant: Endurance Assurance Corporation, Crystal Fue Veavea doing business as Miracle One Builders, Miracle One Builders, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Conner Development Group, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
as 3:2023cv01179
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of CONNER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., and Conner Development Group, Inc.
Defendant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Petitioner: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Southern Spear Ironworks LLC v. Parsons Government Services Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv08347
Plaintiff: Southern Spear Ironworks, LLC and Southern Spear Ironworks LLC
Defendant: Parsons Government Services Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the use and benefit of Sam Chapa Electrical Contractors, LLC v. Mission Support Services, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00250
Plaintiff: the United States of America for the use and benefit of Sam Chapa Electrical Contractors, LLC
Defendant: Mission Support Services, LLC, Federal Insurance Company, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?