Contract Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,303
Menzel v. Fairbanks et al
as 4:2024cv02574
Defendant:
Capital One Auto Finance and Richard Fairbanks
Plaintiff:
Rachel Menzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Front Row Motorsports, Inc. v. Michael DiSeveria
as 24-1626
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. JENKINS and FRONT ROW MOTORSPORTS, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL DISEVERIA and RONALD C. DEVINE
Skinner AgSolutions Inc. v. PlanET Biogas USA Inc.
as 1:2024cv01237
Plaintiff:
Skinner AgSolutions Inc.
Defendant:
PlanET Biogas USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Atrium Circle, G.P. v. Sailormen, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02564
Plaintiff:
Atrium Circle, G.P.
Defendant:
Tar Heels Spice, Inc. and Sailormen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Russianfood.com LLC v. Mayman et al
as 1:2024cv04743
Defendant:
Web.com Group, Inc, Network Solutions, LLC, Newfold Digital, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSIANFOOD.COM LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hernandez v. USA
as 4:2024cv00630
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ronald Hernandez
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Hansen Reynolds LLC v. Blazer
as 2:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
Hansen Reynolds LLC
Defendant:
Brian R Blazer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Leahy v. CMH Homes, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01855
Plaintiff:
Linda Leahy
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc. a Tennessee Corporation Doing business as Clayton Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Neomed Beauty et al v. Keratin Holdings LLC et al
as 7:2024cv05062
Plaintiff:
AM Beauty, Neomed Beauty, Access Equities LLC and others
Defendant:
Keratin Holdings LLC and Manidae Beauty Brands
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Yang Trading, Inc. v. TMAX Logistics, LLC
as 2:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Yan Trading, Inc.
Defendant:
TMAX Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
