Prisoner Petitions Cases

Death Penalty Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 101 - 110 of 4,557
Donald Johnson v. Scott Jordan
as 23-5330
Petitioner / Appellant: DONALD HERB JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee: SCOTT JORDAN, Warden
Paul Speer v. Staci Ibarra, et al
as 23-99003
Petitioner / Appellant: PAUL BRADLEY SPEER
Respondent / Appellee: STACI IBARRA, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex and RYAN THORNELL, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections
BARWICK v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff: DARRYL BRYAN BARWICK
Defendant: RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sievers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lee County)
as 3:2023cv00373
Petitioner: Mark D. Sievers
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sievers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lee County) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00237
Petitioner: Mark D. Sievers
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy Boyle v. Warden, Holman CF, et al
as 23-11073
Petitioner / Appellant: TIMOTHY SCOTT BOYLE
Respondent / Appellee: HOLMAN CF WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Clarence Fry v. Tim Shoop
as 23-3270
Petitioner / Appellant: CLARENCE FRY
Respondent / Appellee: TIM SHOOP, Warden
David Bollinger v. William Gittere
as 23-99002
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID BOLLINGER
Respondent / Appellee: WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden
In re: Melvin Bonnell
as 23-3235
Petitioner: In re: MELVIN BONNELL
Respondent: CHRIS MCBEE, Warden
Alfonso Blake v. William Gittere, et al
as 23-99001
Petitioner / Appellant: ALFONSO MANUEL BLAKE
Respondent / Appellee: WILLIAM GITTERE and CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?