Labor Cases
Cases 251 - 260 of 348,775
Brito Mendoza v. Bocaito, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04324
Plaintiff:
Wilson Javier Brito Mendoza and Nicole Ayala
Defendant:
Bocaito, Inc. doing business as Bocaito, Mayra Ayala and Pablo Ayala
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Feng v. Wang Sheng Medical P.C et al
as 1:2024cv04326
Plaintiff:
Qihong Feng
Defendant:
Wang Sheng Medical P.C and Sheng Wang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez v. Del Rio et al
as 1:2024cv05036
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Aceves Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jose Del Rio and NJ of Joliet, Inc. d/b/a Specialty Auto care
Heino v. SAC Wireless, LLC
as 1:2024cv05045
Plaintiff:
Jacob Heino
Defendant:
SAC Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Leisten v. R&R Pizza Group, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv05068
Plaintiff:
Colby Leisten
Defendant:
R&R Pizza Group, LLC and Jair Reyes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramirez v. Fagiano et al
as 1:2024cv05070
Plaintiff:
Magaly Ramirez
Defendant:
Joseph Fagiano and Doctors Laundry Service, Inc.
Hady Elkobaitry v. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv05138
Plaintiff:
Hady Elkobaitry
Defendant:
HOWMET GLOBAL FASTENING SYSTEMS INC. and Howmet Aerospace Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
McDonald v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
Robert McDonald
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Gonzalez v. G.A.T. Airline Ground Support, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03651
Plaintiff:
Jesus Herrera Gonzalez
Defendant:
G.A.T. Airline Ground Support, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Miranda v. Rexel USA, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Raoul Miranda
Defendant:
Rexel USA, INC. and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
