US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 21,968
Rainbow USA, Inc. v. PM Crimson, LLC
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Rainbow USA, Inc.
Defendant:
PM Crimson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Parker v. DeJoy
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Parker
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stallworth et al v. Barton et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jermari Marshall and Twyla Stallworth
Defendant:
John G. Barton and City of Andalusia, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrett v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Justin Garrett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Griggs v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
David Earl Griggs
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hill v. Brown et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Nona Adam Brown, Joseph Angelo, Paul Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Savannah (INMATE 3)
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Brown
Defendant:
Jail Supervisor Savannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Sellers (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Marvin Moore
Defendant:
Carl Brandon Sellers, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Openly LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Jay Hudson
Defendant:
Openly LLC and Rock Ridge Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
