US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Cases 71 - 80 of 53,751
Berry v. Bailey et al
as 5:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Heath Berry
Defendant:
William C Bailey, Robert E (Bud) Cramer, Jim Scanlon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
American Strategic Insurance Corp v. Hall et al
as 3:2024cv00520
Defendant:
Constance R. Hall, Constance Renee Isbell, Donald Shane Isbell and others
Plaintiff:
American Strategic Insurance Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Hill v. City of Birmingham, The
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Brinceton Hill
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
McKnight v. CRST Lincoln Sales Inc
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Jeremy McKnight
Defendant:
CRST Lincoln Sales Inc doing business as CRST The Transportation Solution Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Posey et al v. Hammer
as 2:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Veronica A Posey and Zhari A Posey
Defendant:
Harvey B Hammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Horton v. Richerson et al
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Horton
Defendant:
Kelly Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pascual v. Martinez et al
as 4:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Angelica Pascual
Defendant:
Cesar G Martinez and Crane Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Giles v. Spring Oaks Capital LLC
as 2:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Krashunda Giles
Defendant:
Spring Oaks Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
