District Court Cases in Alabama
Cases 61 - 70 of 86,689
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Creel v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00325
Petitioner:
Jerome Bradney Creel
Respondent:
Nick Smith, Shumaker, Wakefield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Boykin v. Fox
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Travaris Rashad Boykin
Defendant:
Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attia v. Byrds Garage et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Ahia
Defendant:
Byrds Garage, John Doe, David Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lee v. Cardiovascular Associates, P.C.
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee
Defendant:
Cardiovascular Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Attia v. Martin et al
as 1:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Ahia
Defendant:
Dr. Frank Martin, Dr. Brian Pitrie, Randy Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tate v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Frederick A. Tate
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Easterling Correctional Facility and Steve Marsall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CCB Community Bank v. Brighthouse Life Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
CCB Community Bank
Defendant:
Brighthouse Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
