District Court Cases in Alabama

Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 84,301
Jackson v. Billy
as 1:2022cv00199
Plaintiff: Grimes Jedd Jackson
Defendant: Steve Billy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Montgomery County, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00307
Plaintiff: Peter J. Smith
Defendant: Montgomery County, Alabama and Montgomery County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Calvin Thomas, Jr. v. Rhymes et al
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff: Estate of Calvin Thomas, Jr.
Defendant: Lequisia Shanta Rhymes, Calvin Thomas, III, Desmond Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Toney v. Autauga County Metro Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00304
Plaintiff: Kenneth John Toney
Defendant: Autauga County Metro Jail and Captain Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shirey v. Garrett
as 7:2022cv00646
Petitioner: Cornelia Shirey
Respondent: Warden Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sambo v. Amwaste LLC
as 2:2022cv00647
Plaintiff: Thomas Sambo
Defendant: Amwaste LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00648
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00306
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Metz v. Dodson et al (MAG+)
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff: George D. Metz, II
Defendant: J. Dodson and Donald Valenza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brady v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 1:2022cv00305
Plaintiff: Joshua Patrick Brady
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?