District Court Cases in Alabama
Cases 17,861 - 17,870 of 90,196
Henderson v. Pettway
as 2:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Betty Henderson
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Pettway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Valleydale Hospitality LLC v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Valleydale Hospitality LLC
Defendant:
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Foss v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Knud E Foss
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Woody Anderson Ford and Robichaux Motor Company with its Principal Business in the City of Thibodaux, Lafourche Parish, Louisiana doing business as Robichaux Ford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Herring v. Collection Associates Ltd et al
as 5:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Susan Herring
Defendant:
Collection Associates Ltd and AvanteUSA Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thorn v. Buffalo Rock Company et al
as 3:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Michael E Thorn
Defendant:
Buffalo Rock Company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Battle v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant:
Joseph Headley and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
