District Court Cases in Alabama
Cases 81 - 90 of 90,135
Harshaw v. Clemson et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Darnell DeMarcus DeDrea Harshaw
Defendant:
C/O Clemson, C/O Charlie and C/O Jacob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Truist Bank v. McConaghy Drug Store, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank
Defendant:
McConaghy Drug Store, John McConaghy and Dan McConaghy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Williams v. Tik-Tok, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Tik-Tok, Inc., Zhang Yiming and TIK TOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Conner v. USA
as 1:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Daniel Dewayne Conner
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johns et al v. Hatch et al
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Johnny Johns and Delyum Johns
Defendant:
James Donald Hatch and Presbyterian Church in America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Houser v. O'Neil et al
as 2:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Lecresha Renae Houser
Defendant:
Sean B O'Neil, Tracy Anne Pangillinan, Brett Seybold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Shelby County, Alabama v. Beaulieu
as 2:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Shelby County, Alabama
Defendant:
Henri N Beaulieu, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. Experian Information Solutions Inc
as 5:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Michael Gibson
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rucker v. Hunter Wakefield Inc
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rucker
Defendant:
Hunter Wakefield Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
