US District Court for the Southern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 54,457
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brink v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2023cv01756
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Brink
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Doe Sheriff's Deputies 1-5, Individually, Doe Sheriff's Nurses 6-10, Individually and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Palmer Kearney Mesa Properties, LP et al v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
Palmer Kearney Mesa Properties, LP and GH Palmer, Inc.
Defendant:
City of San Diego and Mayor and City Council of the City of San Diego
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ganey et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2023cv01448
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Poustchi v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv01746
Plaintiff:
Zahra S. Poustchi
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Marine Taxonomic Services, Ltd.
as 3:2023cv01747
Respondent:
Marine Taxonomic Services, Ltd.
Petitioner:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 es Fed. Question: Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 es Removal- Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
