California Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 121,311
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06184
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06150
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06151
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06152
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06149
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
(PC) Davis v. Bobbla We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv01276
Plaintiff: Maurice Daronte Davis-Rogers and Maurice Daronte Davis
Defendant: Dr. A. Sangha and Manjala Bobbla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TO BE DELETED - AJB (HC) Singh v. Borla
as 2:2024cv02002
Petitioner: Harpreet Singh
Respondent: Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Singh v. Borla
as 2:2024cv02003
Respondent: Edward Borla
Petitioner: Harpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Rouser v. Gavin Newsom et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv06160
Defendant: Muhammad Younus, J. Eshelman, Carillo and others
Petitioner: William Rouser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04408
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?