California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 121,325
Devin Kyle Wade v. Central District of California
as 5:2024cv01563
Respondent:
Central District of California
Petitioner:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Latasha Brown v. De La Cruz et al
as 2:2024cv06269
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom and De La Cruz
Plaintiff:
Latasha Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. L.A.P.D. et al
as 4:2024cv04467
Defendant:
L.A.P.D., J. Corona and M. Pena
Plaintiff:
Devon Levi Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Warden at Solano State Prison
as 3:2024cv04465
Respondent:
Warden at Solano State Prison
Petitioner:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. Hamilton
as 4:2024cv04468
Defendant:
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kakowski
as 3:2024cv04469
Plaintiff:
Brian Kakowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv01278
Defendant:
Deborah Barnes, Dana M. Sabraw, CDCR Carillo and others
Plaintiff:
Derrik Blanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Papazian v. Trate
as 1:2024cv00851
Respondent:
B. M. Trate
Petitioner:
James Michael Papazian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06246
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
