US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,120
Calkins #411886 v. Demorest
as 1:2021cv00809
Plaintiff:
Robert Calkins and Robert Calkins #411886
Defendant:
Anthony Demorest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris #370250 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00805
Plaintiff:
Edaveon Montrell Harris #370250
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Unknown Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talton v. Grand Rapids Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv00633
Plaintiff:
Jaeloni Talton
Defendant:
Grand Rapids Police Department, David Kadzban, Brandon Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez #230341 v. Borchord et al
as 1:2021cv00603
Plaintiff:
Peter Alfred Perez #230341
Defendant:
Fred L. Borchord, Kathleen A. Miller, Saginaw, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holbrook #767925 v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 1:2021cv00543
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Charles Judson Holbrook #767925
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Foremost Insurance
as 1:2021cv00542
Plaintiff:
Tyler Adam Thomas
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hodges v. Abram et al
as 1:2021cv00500
Defendant:
Sergeant Joseph Abram, John Doe Deputies, County of Kent and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krusell v. Biden et al
as 1:2021cv00484
Plaintiff:
Michael James Krusell
Defendant:
Peter Wallin, Joe Biden, Thomas Zimmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson #369523 v. Brydle et al
as 1:2021cv00477
Plaintiff:
Paul Thomas Peterson #369523
Defendant:
Gary T. Salwin and Lamesha L. Brydle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Lasata et al
as 1:2021cv00454
Defendant:
Corey Burks, Paul Bailey, Charles T. Lasata and others
Plaintiff:
Hurtis L. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
