US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 71 - 80 of 24,255
BENJAMIN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00716
Petitioner:
TAMIN KENYON BENJAMIN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MASSEY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
RHONDA MASSEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ALAMANCE-BURLINGTON SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION v. META PLATFORMS, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00692
Defendant:
TIKTOK, LLC, FACEBOOK OPERATIONS, LLC, FACEBOOK PAYMENTS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ALAMANCE-BURLINGTON SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
VINES v. REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2024cv00697
Defendant:
REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
Pamela Vines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
GIBSON v. PARNELL et al
as 1:2024cv00694
Defendant:
DIANNE PARNELL, STEPHEN WILEY and THE ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE (ADL)
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HUGULEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00715
Petitioner:
MELDAMION ANTOINE HUGULEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
OWENS v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2024cv00695
Petitioner:
AUSTIN RANDY OWENS
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00712
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
BARRON BERNARD LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GUEVARA v. PARSONS et al
as 1:2024cv00713
Respondent:
MICHAEL PARSONS and JOSHUA H. STEIN
Petitioner:
JORDAN MENDOZA GUEVARA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
