District Court Cases in North Carolina
Cases 61 - 70 of 87,287
Eaves et al v. Octapharma Plasma, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Sarabeth Eaves and Bonnie Eaves
Defendant:
Octapharma Plasma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pavkovich v. USA
as 5:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ben Pavkovich
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00437
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Davis, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Milligan v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Kelly Milligan
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Bank of America Corporation, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Oppenheimer v. Highland Falls Country Club, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Highland Falls Country Club, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Gunter v. US DOJ et al
as 5:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Angela Dell Gunter
Defendant:
US DOJ, NC SBI and NC FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wrenn v. Williamson et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Simone Wrenn
Defendant:
Kiara Williamson, DaJour Jones, Deborah Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Macedon v. Castle et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Monica B. Macedon
Defendant:
Jackie Castle, Thomas E. McDonald, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elliott v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Donald Brainard Elliott, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Monroe v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Charles Walter Monroe, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
