Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 121 - 130 of 17,849
Holloway v. Korecz et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff: Case Holloway
Defendant: Police Officer Korecz, Police Officer Young, Police Officer Chesser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larr v. Mackey
as 2:2024cv01730
Petitioner: Michael L. Larr
Respondent: Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00663
Petitioner: Kiaran Young
Respondent: Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larr v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00656
Petitioner: Michael L. Larr
Respondent: Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belton v. Shoop
as 3:2024cv00655
Petitioner: Anthony Belton
Respondent: Warden Timothy Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goins v. Winkel
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff: Justin Goins
Defendant: Corporal Winkel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Miller v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
as 3:2024cv00105
Petitioner: James C Miller
Defendant: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhodes, III v. Wellpath et al.
as 4:2024cv00641
Plaintiff: EnRico T Rhodes, III
Defendant: Wellpath, Commissioner D. Ditzler, Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner: Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent: David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?