District Court Cases in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 426,298
RIVERA v. WALMART, INC.
as 2:2024cv02003
Plaintiff:
LETICIA RIVERA
Defendant:
WALMART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
v. American Airlines Group Inc. AKA/DBA American Airlines et al
as 2:2024cv02025
Defendant:
American Airlines Group Inc. AKA/DBA American Airlines and Dr. Hazelwood Harry, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
SECURA INSURANCE COMPANY v. HOOVER BUILDING SPECIALISTS LLC et al
as 5:2024cv02000
Plaintiff:
SECURA INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
HOOVER BUILDING SPECIALISTS LLC, YARNELL SECURITY SYSTEMS and J.M. BEILER ENTERPRISE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
APTHROP v. FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUIONS, INC.
as 2:2024cv02024
Plaintiff:
JESSE R APTHROP
Defendant:
FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
UNIVERSAL TURBINE PARTS, LLC v. PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP. et al
as 2:2024cv02021
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSAL TURBINE PARTS, LLC
Defendant:
PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP., Pratt & Whitney Canada Holdings Corp. and P&WC Turbo Engines Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Heino v. SAC Wireless, LLC
as 2:2024cv02009
Plaintiff:
Jacob Heino
Defendant:
SAC Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
