Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 10,828
MANDER v. SCI HOUTZDALE et al
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EUGENE MANDER, III
Defendant:
SCI HOUTZDALE, JOHN DOE, C.O. MUNSHOWER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TIPTON v. SCHULTZ et al
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
AARON TIPTON
Defendant:
LORI SCHULTZ, ESTHER STANTON, SANDRA SIMMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: COREY ROBERTS
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
COREY ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARTLETT v. PRISONS?
as 2:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
NIHJAE BARTLETT
Defendant:
PRISONS?
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
WINDEL HOLMES
Defendant:
WELLPATH, RNS BRAD AVENALI, SUPERINTENDENT SCOTT KLINEFELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KNECHT v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
JOHN KNECHT
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE ROBERTS, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOVEL v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
TAMALA KATHLEEN DOVEL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN PAUL SMEAL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE#'S 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gardner v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Khashir Gardner
Defendant:
Commissioner BLANCHE CARNEY, Deputy Commissioner TERRANCE CLARK, BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EL v. BLACK
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
RYSHEID MALIK EL
Defendant:
Corrections Officer CHAD BLACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LEE
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, TODD BICKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
